Randomville

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
GigaBook.com
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: The Slow Suckitude of Atari  (Read 1609 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dan

  • Tetris Master
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 13,521
The Slow Suckitude of Atari
« on: June 17, 2005, 10:35:29 AM »

I saw this on CNN.com and thought the gamers around here would like to read it.  

Link

The sad, slow fall of Atari
Revolving executive door, weak game catalog put a question mark on publisher's future.
June 17, 2005: 8:16 AM EDT
Game Over is a weekly column by Chris Morris


NEW YORK (CNN/Money) In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Atari was king of the video game mountain. Now it's barely the court jester.

The Atari of old offered games and a home console the Atari 2600 that could be found in the living rooms of cool kids everywhere. The Atari of today is plagued by a revolving door in the executive suite and boasts a questionable line-up of upcoming games.

Fourth-quarter losses for the firm, reported earlier this week, came in at $9.1 million better than last year's $17.3 million loss, but hardly confidence inspiring. And the comments from company executives in the conference call following the earnings announcement weren't exactly upbeat.

"When we can stop shooting ourselves in the foot ...Atari's going to be a spectacular company," said Diane Baker, chief financial officer.

Bruno Bonnell, chairman and interim chief executive, didn't give investors reason to cheer either. "We remain optimistic about Atari's future," he said, "but at the same time we recognized the challenges ahead."

Some of those challenges are the company's own doing. Atari's two biggest titles for this holiday season haven't created any sort of buzz in the gaming world. "Mark Ecko's Getting Up: Contents Under Pressure," which blends fighting with graffiti, offers something different, which usually gets gamers excited. Judging by message board chatter, though, the game hasn't pinged too many radars. "The Matrix: Path of Neo," meanwhile, may be leaning too heavily on a Hollywood license that has lost its appeal.

Granted, 2003's "Enter the Matrix" is one of the best selling games in Atari's history (2.5 million copies sold in the first month) but audiences at the time were salivating over the forthcoming movie sequels. Now they've seen the films and most wonder why they were ever excited in the first place. And, to be frank, "Enter the Matrix" was a pretty bad game, something gamers will remember.

Some foreshadowing might be found in another game set in the "Matrix" universe. "The Matrix Online," published by Sega, has only sold 43,100 copies since its launch in late March, according to The NPD Group.

Atari (Research) has made some public mea culpas over the past year, bringing in a new management team and vowing to put things right. Confidence in that turnaround took a nosedive, though, when CEO Jim Caparro abruptly left the company last week - after just seven months in the job - to run Glenayre Technologies' Entertainment Distribution division. Calls to Caparro about the reasons behind his departure were not returned.

Last year, Atari lost a key partner with Epic Games (makers of the phenomenally popular "Unreal" franchise) jumped to rival Midway (Research) Games. Earlier this year, the company gave up publishing rights to the Xbox version of "Sid Meier's Pirates!" even though development on the game was nearly complete.

Despite this, Atari seems to be struggling mightily to position itself as a publisher of mature (though not necessarily mature-rated) games. This week, it announced plans to jettison the Humongous Entertainment studio, makers of the "Backyard" line of sports games for children.

This positioning, along with at least one unannounced title that is generating some quiet excitement among developers, might make the company more attractive to buyers, but is it the right move?

Atari has a strong history with younger audiences. It has been wisely tapping into its past with sales of the Atari Flashback, a plug-and-play device that lets you play classic Atari 2600 games on your TV. It has also, in the past few years, put out games for Tonka, Thomas the Tank Engine, Blues Clues and Dora the Explorer, among others.

While making children's games might make Atari a little less "cool" in some eyes, it's an underserved market. THQ (Research), for years, has made a fortune off of games using Scooby Doo, and Hot Wheels as well as the Disney and Nickelodeon licenses. It's only in the last couple of years that the company has begun a serious push for older gamers.

Certainly, several hot licenses for children's games are locked tight for now, but contracts expire and new hot shows spring up all the time.

Atari would be wise to follow the THQ model: Establish a strong financial base in a lucrative, though less popular sub-genre, still putting out the occasional game for the more mature audience. Then, years down the road, carefully begin dipping its toes into the adult gaming field again only this time, less Neo and more Neat-o.
-------------
Morris is Director of Content Development for CNN/Money.
Logged

Jonathan

  • Future Boy
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 9,319
The Slow Suckitude of Atari
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2005, 11:00:43 AM »

Sigh...again?

The old Atari, the company that made the 2600, etc., actually is no more. This Atari was the company that bought the intellectual property of the old company and changed their name to Atari. Apparently, they bought the curse as well.
Logged
"I believe that in the long view of history, the British Empire will be remembered only for two things. The game of football, and the expression 'fuck off.'" - Sir Richard Turnbull

Sonic Boom

  • Master of 4 chords
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 1,161
The Slow Suckitude of Atari
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2005, 11:20:34 AM »

Quote from: "Jonathan"
Sigh...again?

The old Atari, the company that made the 2600, etc., actually is no more. This Atari was the company that bought the intellectual property of the old company and changed their name to Atari. Apparently, they bought the curse as well.

Ah... I was gonna say, I didn't even know Atari existed anymore except "in name."
Logged
color=DarkGreen]Kill Your Co-Workers [/color]

Dan

  • Tetris Master
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 13,521
The Slow Suckitude of Atari
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2005, 12:04:46 PM »

I didn't know it existed at all, to be honest.
Logged

monkey neck

  • Strange, but not a stranger
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 706
The Slow Suckitude of Atari
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2005, 01:12:46 PM »

Quote from: "Jonathan"

The old Atari, the company that made the 2600, etc., actually is no more. This Atari was the company that bought the intellectual property of the old company and changed their name to Atari.


Kind of like WOXY.  I was actually kind embarrassed to run around with a 97.7 window decal in my car while it was X97.7.
Logged

thepsychicpoirot

  • Guest
The Slow Suckitude of Atari
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2005, 02:07:05 PM »

I feel a lot better now that I have a new logo "woxy.com" sticker.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up