Randomville

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Pitchfork's blunder  (Read 2864 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AngelV

  • City Elder
  • Posts: 1,121
    • http://www.dimpleandasmirk.com/
Pitchfork's blunder
« on: June 16, 2004, 11:53:22 AM »

Anyone else read the retraction on Pitchfork's site today regarding yesterday's Beastie Boys review? And now the writer is MIA? Hmm...would have thought Pitchfork would have learned a thing or two from the recent New York Times and USA Today fabrication scandals.
Logged
And I didn't stand there when you were bumming out over a particularly witty and insightful monologue by moi. So bust out your own violins and have a pity party with yourself." -- Greg Dulli

bmxer43

  • City Elder
  • Posts: 425
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2004, 11:58:47 AM »

Yeah, unfortunatly, I wasn't interested enough to read the review yesterday.  Now I wish I had.
Logged
earching for something forever gone.....something we will always want---robert smith

rva

  • Guest
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2004, 12:21:02 PM »

They should have just fired that dude for sucking a long time ago.  I hate that reviewer.
Logged

slow-dog

  • City Elder
  • Posts: 881
    • http://www.slow-dog.com/
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2004, 12:38:36 PM »

I used to really like Brent D's reviews, circa 1999 or so, but he has been on a long decline, and he did always strike me as kind of an ass.  I even met him once.
Logged

slow-dog

  • City Elder
  • Posts: 881
    • http://www.slow-dog.com/
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2004, 12:48:12 PM »

On further review of this review, I think that it's just like Brent's writing at Pitchfork...the first half (well 6 paragraphs) is good, and it all goes pear-shaped from there.
Logged

rva

  • Guest
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2004, 07:33:28 PM »

Okay, so I finally went and read the review and isn't it just a hoax?  

It reads like the same smart-ass kind of shit Brent D pulls in all his reviews.  He always does  his reviews  in some "clever" format (fake interview, fake first person, mock e-mail) , not realizing there is in fact a BROAD line between clever and stupid and only he can't see it.

I'm guessing he wrote the first part in italics himself as part of the review.
Logged

Juliana

  • City Elder
  • Posts: 4,775
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2004, 09:16:17 AM »

what was the review?  Is it up somewhere?
Logged
We all agree that genocide, avalanches, and Family Circus are not funny
-Ed Helms

AngelV

  • City Elder
  • Posts: 1,121
    • http://www.dimpleandasmirk.com/
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2004, 09:45:35 AM »

I'm trying to see if I can find it on a blog somewhere. But the version that is currently on Pitchfork's site has been modified...it's shorter than the one that originally ran on Tuesday. I'm not so sure it's a hoax since they went through the trouble of taking down part of the review and ran a retraction notice on their front page Wednesday.  My guess is it was a CYA move to avoid being sued by Nasty Little Man.
Logged
And I didn't stand there when you were bumming out over a particularly witty and insightful monologue by moi. So bust out your own violins and have a pity party with yourself." -- Greg Dulli

Sonic Boom

  • Master of 4 chords
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 1,163
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2004, 01:49:42 PM »

Yeah, it's not a hoax.  He is apparently no longer a part of the Pitchfork writing staff, from what I've heard...
Logged
color=DarkGreen]Kill Your Co-Workers [/color]

Pretend Girl

  • Summer Resident
  • Posts: 18
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #9 on: June 19, 2004, 08:06:13 PM »

I haven't been keeping up with things at Pitchfork lately so when I heard that Brent wasn't writing there anymore, I had to look into it.  Brent has been my favorite reviewer on that site ever since I started reading Pitchfork, and nothing has changed.  I might not whole-heartedly enjoy his style of writing--of reviewing an album and trying to make it into some sort of novel or short story or anything that doesn't have to do with the music itself--but I do agree with almost everything he says.  He tends to like and dislike the same bands and albums that I do for the same reasons, and while he may be a smart ass, he is exceptionally bright.  I had to look up the original article that he wrote, though it doesn't matter because all they took out of it on the site was the personal bitterness he felt towards Steve.  I for one think that he went out the way he should have gone out.  What he wrote, once you look past his bitterness, is meaningful, incredibly insightful, and should cause anyone who relies on other people's reviews for their music purchases and opinions to reflect on what music has meant to them.  So amen, brother.  I'm sure a lot of people are happy to see him go because he's a hard man to tolerate, but I'm happy that he can go do something personally fulfilling, and leave me with a little bit of insight in the process.
Logged

SteelTown Boy

  • Trust the DJ
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 1,433
    • http://www.steelcityvideomix.com
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2004, 02:59:36 PM »

yow...
Logged
b]I like 99 Rappers,but Jay-Z ain't one-Sage Francis[/b]

i'm just a blog

Wherle

  • Punching Bag
  • Administrator
  • City Elder
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,999
    • Hi-Vox
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2004, 11:14:40 AM »

What I find interesting is that people aren't talking about OUR writers on our boards as much as they are this cat.

Looks like we need some controversy. Quick, somebody do something controversial!
Logged

Butter

  • Probably in the car
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 8,660
  • Spreadsheets R Us
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2004, 11:15:26 AM »

Scott, you're an idiot.

(How's that?)
Logged

Pretend Girl

  • Summer Resident
  • Posts: 18
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2004, 11:29:53 AM »

You should get Brent to write for you.
Logged

SteelTown Boy

  • Trust the DJ
  • City Elder
  • Posts: 1,433
    • http://www.steelcityvideomix.com
Pitchfork's blunder
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2004, 11:38:56 AM »

we don't have any venom to spark that much controversey.
Logged
b]I like 99 Rappers,but Jay-Z ain't one-Sage Francis[/b]

i'm just a blog
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up